Participatory zoning initiatives are underway in scores of protected areas in the tropics where forests are rich, but people are poor. Ideally, participatory zoning promises to
In this exercise, you will assume the role of a real-life stakeholder from Tambopata. Based on your stakeholder’s interests, you will define your land-use priorities for TNR, find allies, and negotiate with your opponents as you collectively negotiate and vote on one of four zoning proposal maps created in the local participatory planning process. In thinking about which map should guide land use activities in Tambopata’s future, consider the following: Why do your interests deserve priority? What kinds of activities will generate income without destroying biodiversity? Does your character have special interest in a certain area, e.g. the fertile, gold-rich and scenic riversides? Which areas have old-growth forests? Conversely, which areas are already deforested? Which activities are taking place up-stream from your character’s areas of interest?
You will advocate for your stakeholder’s vision for Tambopata by participating in a role-played roundtable and writing a position paper. At the roundtable and in the paper, you will identify the map you think best matches your character’s priorities, and (most importantly) defend your character’s position using moral, environmental and/or economic arguments:
Moral Arguments: Who should benefit from Tambopata’s forests and why? The area's original indigenous inhabitants? Or the largest group, namely small-scale farmers of mixed ancestry, some of whom have lived in Tambopata for decades, others only a few years? Which kinds of land use activities can offer security for Tambopata’s residents? Do Tambopata's forests and wildlife deserve protection apart from human economic concerns?
Environmental Arguments: What land uses are most likely to maintain biodiversity and/or other ecosystem services? How can environmentally destructive practices be mitigated? Why should certain activities be conducted in certain areas of TNR (e.g. where does old-growth forest persist? Where has forest already been cleared? Which areas are up/down stream? Which areas are closer to the Bahuaja-Sonene National Park?)?
Economic Arguments: Tambopata is poor. What kind of economic activities should have priority? Why? Which kinds of land use activities can generate capital and taxes to improve Tambopata’s services?
Instructors: If you are interested in using this assignment, contact naughton@geography.wisc.edu for a teacher’s guide.
The Tambopata National Reserve (TNR) was created in 1990 to protect one of the most biologically diverse and least disturbed forests on the planet. The region is also home to indigenous people, like the Ese’eja, who see their very survival threatened by development. Many other local residents see Tambopata as a poor region of Peru that contains untapped reserves of timber, gold, and farmland.
To balance biodiversity protection with economic development, officials are promoting participatory zoning of the 272,000 hectares of land within TNR. Leading this zoning exercise is Peru’s Ministry of the Environment. The Ministry has invited local stakeholder groups to propose zoning maps and promote their map at a public roundtable. The consensus map selected at the roundtable will guide future management.
1890-1915: The global demand for rubber leads companies to penetrate the forests of Tambopata to tap rubber trees. These companies bring the first wave of colonists, diseases, and market economies to the region.
1930: People begin to extract Brazil nuts from Tambopata for international markets. Small-scale gold mining begins.
1990s: The Tambopata Candamo Reserve Zone (TCRZ) is created as a temporary reserve on 1.5 million hectares, including uninhabited forests and areas settled by ~6000 people. The local farmers’ federation FADEMAD and a local conservation group, Conservation Internacional-Peru (CI-Peru), work together to classify land in the region according to its agricultural potential and create a national park (“Bahuaja-Sonene”) (see VIDEO “Return to Tambopata”).
Late 1990s, early 2000’s: Participatory mapping and zoning exercises resume.
2000: The Peruvian Congress passes a new Sustainable Forestry Law. A moratorium is temporarily placed on logging in the Peruvian Amazon due to “destructive, corrupt, and wasteful” practices. Local loggers revolt and burn government vehicles and confiscated timber. They demand to log forests and to dissolve the TCRZ. The protestors set up a roadblock near the airport. One person killed, offices burned. After three days, anti-riot police from Lima squelch the protest with tear gas and arrests. INRENA lifts the logging moratorium.
2008: As global economic crisis sets in, gold prices soar, and a gold rush brings tens of thousands of Peruvians to Tambopata.
2012: SERNANP uses an emergency decree to halt mining within the Tambopata Reserve. Public riots break out. The National Federation of Miners of Peru strikes and burns government buildings. Six people die in the ensuing conflict. The decree stands. Peru’s military evicts most of the miners from the Reserve. Mining continues (illegally) in the proposed Buffer Zone.
2020: Mining conflicts continue to this day…
Maria Silva has harvested Brazil nuts since she was a child. Her family holds a 40-year
concession
A formal permit issued by the government for a certain activity (e.g. mining, logging, ecotourism)
for a specified period of time (usually several years, although not permanent).
for harvesting Brazil nuts in 500
hectares
A 100 x 100 m unit of land (1 hectare = 2.3 acres).
Abbreviated “ha". Most Tambopata farms are ~40 ha.
of old growth forest in the northeastern
part of the Tambopata National Reserve. As a member of the local Agrarian Federation
(FADEMAD),
Leader of the Agrarian Federation(FADEMAD)
Alan leads FADEMAD, a grassroots political organization that represents
~5000 small farmers in the Madre de Dios region. Alan believes that poor farmers’ quality of life
depends on a healthy environment. Thus, he tries to defend local farmers AND the forest. Click
FADEMAD to learn how
Alan weighs the costs and benefits of land management practices of his varied constituents are interested in pursuing.
Maria strongly believes that local poor citizens should have priority to use natural resources
in the Reserve, but they must do so sustainably. Her livelihood depends on access to the old growth
forests that contain large Brazil nut trees. These trees take decades to start producing nuts and
cannot be cultivated in plantations. The most productive trees are over a century old and more than
ten stories high. By law, Brazil nut trees cannot be felled, but they are commonly cleared during
agriculture or mining.
Brazil nut harvesting is hard work. Brazil nut trees are dispersed across the forest. Thus, Maria must walk a wide area to gather the cannonball-like seed pods that fall from each Brazil nut tree. Even though it’s labor intensive, most environmentalists believe Brazil nut harvesting is one of the most sustainable ways for local poor people to make money off the forest. Brazil nut trees are also a keystone species. Wildlife Ecologist Dr. Natalia Ortiz is a Peruvian scientist who studies the ecology of Giant River Otters in Tambopata. She is fighting to protect wildlife for all Peruvians, including future generations. Click Wildlife Ecologist to learn how Dr. Ortiz views conservation work as an important aspect for the success of this region of Peru.
Maria fears that mining and agriculture will destroy these forests and, ultimately, her family’s livelihood. But she’s also worried that she can’t make enough money only harvesting Brazil nuts, especially given the rudimentary infrastructure available for transporting and processing the nuts. Thus, Maria is exploring other options.
Some Brazil nut harvesters are trying to attract tourists to pay for the experience of harvesting Brazil nuts, and the sons and
daughters of some Brazil nut harvesters already have jobs in tourism Maria has also learned
that outside the Reserve, some Brazil nut harvesters are partnering with
loggers
Owner of Peruvian Logging Company
Vicente owns Madera Grande, a large Peruvian logging company. He’s eager to expand his logging company’s operations. Click
Logging to
learn how Vicente is working with other interest groups to make logging profitable and sustainable business practice in the Tambopata region.
who claim to be using methods that extract timber without damaging Brazil nut trees. Logging is currently not allowed in the Brazil nut
in the Reserve, but some Brazil nut harvesters think it would be a good way to add value to the standing forest
and help compete against mining or agriculture. Other Brazil nut harvesters suspect loggers will seriously damage
the forest. Last, Maria has heard that some other Brazil nut harvesters have signed contracts with a
Peruvian conservation company, Bosques Amazónicos,
to be paid for protecting forest and planting Brazil nut tree seedlings in their concessions. The company
has also promised to build a Brazil nut processing plant. The payments come from a forest carbon fund
associated with global climate change mitigation efforts known as
REDD+.
"Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation", is an
incentive-based mechanism for reducing greenhouse gas emissions through improved forest management in developing countries.
Maria thinks these are all promising opportunities; but, above all, what Brazil nut harvesters lack the most is access
to a better Brazil nut processing plant.